Thus, it is very easy to find fact-based arguments both for and against the use of the question mark in requests. Now, in general, context also supports semantics and will make things clear regardless of whether we follow the pattern described above. Type 1 sentences are distinguished by a rising intonation in speech, and it would be useful to have a mark to do the same in writing. In Type 1 sentences, what the speaker wants is a verbal response in Type 2 sentences, the speaker is asking for a non-verbal action, conformity with a rule etc. (Actually requesting theĬompletion of a physical action on a physical object.) Type 1: Would you pass the test? (Asking about the consequent of some (Making a request, perhaps a teacher trying to forestall dissent or chatter.) Type 1: Can you raise your hand? (Inquiring about ability, perhaps a physiotherapist to a patient).
It's useful to have a typographical way of distinguishing two types of utterance which are otherwise graphically identical, e.g.: * New Oxford American Dictionary (2nd Edition) Hence, you should always terminate any sentence beginning with " could you" with a question mark. 'No problem!' (Man signs in indicated box.) (Response: Brother extends hand to hold item for Eric.) ' Could you hold this for a sec?' Eric asked his brother.'I'm sorry, Isaac, but you will have to turn it in at the same time as everyone else.' 'Professor Calculus, please could you give me an extension on this assignment?'.They are requests, indicating something is being asked forĪ response or reply (verbal or not) is required of the person being asked Thus, all "Could you…" sentences are really questions because According to my dictionary*, question is defined thus:Ī sentence worded or expressed so as to elicit informationĪlso, one of my dictionary* definitions of could is:Ī modal verb used in making polite requests
0 kommentar(er)
